This week, much of the world got uptight over the visit of a Jewish man to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Jordanian, Palestinian, and other Arab leaders and entities referred to it as the “storming of Al-Aqsa” and “violating its sanctity.” Itamar Ben Gvir is the newly-appointed national security minister in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's newly-installed government. However, it’s not the first time he’s visited the site, nor the first time a minister in Israel’s government has done so. So why all the fuss now?
After reunifying Jerusalem in the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel restored custodianship of the Temple Mount and the Islamic holy site (Al-Aqsa Mosque) to the control of Jordan. In retrospect, while this was arguably a mistake, there were many reasons to do so.
First, in the wake of its sweeping military victory, Israel did not want to create wider problems with the Arab and Muslim world.
Second, Israel held to the naïve belief that, in doing so – and by offering to return territory conquered by Israel to Jordan, Egypt, and Syria respectively – there would be peace.
Third was that Jordan’s Hashemite King Hussein staked a large part of his legitimacy on being the custodian of the Al-Aqsa Mosque. In a country where the Hashemite minority rules over an ethnic Palestinian Arab majority, removing that pillar of Hussein’s legitimacy could have undermined his rule and resulted in brought a Palestinian Arab terror state.
What followed is that the Temple Mount has been governed by the Jordanian-backed Islamic Waqf under what’s known as the “status quo.” The status quo is a biased model, discriminating against billions of Jews and Christians. It’s a wonder that any liberal western country would back, much less outright support such a policy.
The status quo says that Jews and Christians have no legitimacy and cannot pray on the Temple Mount. Considering that Jerusalem and the Temple are the cornerstones of Judaism and Christianity, to say that’s absurd is absurdly polite.
But since 1967, when status quo was established, the Waqf and the Palestinian Authority have locked horns in their blatant disregard of the issue, while competing for influence against one another.
In general, the Waqf have widened their influence over the entire Temple Mount, hijacking the entire 35 acres as holy Al-Aqsa, while desecrating it themselves. In fact, only the Al-Aqsa Mosque is their third holiest site, yet not holy enough to be mentioned in the Koran. The more magnificent seventh-century Dome of the Rock is not a holy site. But by divine miracle, now the whole Temple Mount is holy to Islam.
Generally, they have tried to erase Jewish history in Jerusalem and on the Temple Mount, specifically. They accuse Israel of trying to “Judaize” Jerusalem. This is in direct violation of good faith, and of anyone whose faith is rooted in the Bible. It is a direct contradiction to the Waqf, itself, which published a document 100 years ago, recognizing the Temple Mount as the site of Solomon’s Temple. Now, that is not only nowhere to be found, but the Waqf and Islamists worldwide deny it to be true.
If denying it on paper and in their propaganda was not bad enough, they violated the status quo by excavating under the Temple Mount to expand infrastructure for one of their mosques. In doing so, they committed an archaeological crime by carting off truckloads of layers of artifacts from Temple times, and dumping it as if to dump biblical history with it.
At the same time, they accuse Israel of trying to dig under the Temple Mount to rebuild the Temple, neglecting to acknowledge that “rebuilding” the Temple affirms it was once there, even though they deny it. Not only are they unable to get their history and lies straight but they see no contradiction. Anything goes when it comes to blaming Israel for things that are not happening.
And what about that status quo? What about the world’s outcry of creeping Islamist encroachment on the sanctity of the Temple Mount, and the lies and subterfuge to cover that up? Does nobody see it? Does nobody care?
The fact is that many do care. The past two years have seen record numbers of Jews and Christians ascending to the Temple Mount, albeit under close scrutiny by the Waqf, and Israeli security which controls access to the one gate to the Temple Mount through which non-Muslims are allowed to pass. While there is no prayer allowed – and certainly no place for an unobtrusive prayer service – some do pray silently. Yet the actual status quo is abusively discriminatory against Jews and Christians, a modern application of Jim Crow laws and apartheid on the Temple Mount, where only Muslims have free access and freedom to worship.
There was once a day where Jim Crow, apartheid, and human slavery were status quo. The world changed, as did the societies in which they were commonplace. Why is it only the status quo in Jerusalem that’s sacred, where one side can violate it with impunity, while the other side is accused of violating it just because of one person’s visit?
Inside the American embassy in Jerusalem there’s a sign expressing U.S. policy against female genital mutilation, something still practiced in the Arab and Islamic world. Because it’s inside, phones and cameras are not allowed, so I have no picture. In some parts of the world, it is still a practice that is considered “status quo.” But the United States has rightly taken a position against it. It’s interesting that the sign is only in English and Arabic, because at the U.S. Embassy to Israel, the U.S. knows that the problem is not among Jews.
Standards that impact any status quo are not static. One can make the case why these terms were agreed to back in 1967, but times and reality have changed. After the U.S. moved its embassy to Jerusalem in 2018, not only were there no longer riots on Arab streets, but shortly after the move, four Arab countries embraced reality and made peace with Israel.
Despite threats of rocket attacks from Hamas, bloodshed and other violence to “confront the (Jewish) raids into Al-Aqsa,” the Arab streets did not ignite in flames of protest this week: Not from this one visit, and not from the tens of thousands of others who visited in 2022 alone. There should be no reason for unimpeded Jewish and Christian visits to the Temple Mount, or that security precautions (i.e., checking for offensive materials and weapons) should be limited to non-Muslims. In addition, there should be no reason why Christians and Jews cannot pray on the Temple Mount openly; not to get in the way of, obstruct or deny Muslims their right to pray. But just to be able to do so.
Many western countries – allies of Israel – denounced this week’s Temple Mount visit and (France) committed to “absolute attachment to preservation of the status quo,” even if that status quo is obscenely discriminatory.
The visit by one Jewish man this week – no matter who he is – is not a provocation by definition, nor a breach of the status quo. By sounding off and making it seem like it is, regardless of whether the status quo is wrong, these western allies pour fuel on the fire of the Islamist lies – defining what is really holy on the Temple Mount, and who it is holy to.
Denial of truth is not unique in Islam. In fact, it’s even a legitimate tactic. Taqiyya is a term to describe when Muslims are sanctioned to deceive unbelievers – Jews, Christians, and other non-Muslims – for the greater good of Islam. If 100 years ago, the Islamic custodian of the Temple Mount – before the country of Jordan existed) said, ‘Yes, the Temple Mount is the site of the Temple of Solomon, and thus holy to Jews and Christians, and now it isn’t,’ which lie are we to believe?
Jonathan Feldstein was born and educated in the U.S. and immigrated to Israel in 2004. He is married and the father of six. Throughout his life and career, he has become a respected bridge between Jews and Christians and serves as president of the Genesis 123 Foundation. He writes regularly on major Christian websites about Israel and shares experiences of living as an Orthodox Jew in Israel. He is host of the popular Inspiration from Zion podcast. He can be reached at email@example.com.